폭력적인 지하디스트들보다 더 나쁜 자들은 누구인가?
Islamist terrorist bombings in the London subways. Buddhists beheaded by fanatical Muslims in Thailand. Hurricanes and Live 8 aside, the global event horizon these days seems to encompass little else but revolutionary (actually reactionary) Islamic violence. How much worse could it get?
Much worse.
So far the bombings, attacks, murders and beheadings have been the province of mere jihadis—basically mundane, albeit dangerous, Islamic fundamentalists. Islamic fundamentalists, in a nutshell, reject modernity;1
that is, they anathematize the mainstream of Western—and, by now,
global—thought which has predominated since the Enlightenment,
predicated upon: a Cartesian cleavage between reason and revelation,
politically-enforced separation of religion and state and optimistic
(well-nigh utopian) faith in science and technology. Many Christian
fundamentalists share this antipathy for modernity. But jihadis
(perhaps somewhere between 1 and 10% of the world’s 1.3 billion
Muslims) differ from Jerry Falwell in that, for them, history has taken a
horrible wrong turn. The religion of the final and perfect revelation
of Allah to mankind still lags, in number of adherents, to that
superseded tritheism known as Christianity (with its 2 billion members).
Islamic political power, regnant from Morocco to Indonesia and from the
Hungarian forests to the African savanna in 1491, was first eclipsed by
Europeans and now is dwarfed by the American imperium and its Cowboy
Christian Caesar (triply galling to Usamah bin Ladin, as well as to
Democrats and the French) and betrayed internally by faux Muslim leaders
like Mubarak, Musharraf and the Saudi princes.
The cure for Islamic religious, political and cultural malaise, according to jihadi
fundamentalism, is simple (albeit easier said than done): replacing
fake Muslim rulers and governments with truly Islamic ones that impose
and enforce shari`ah, or Islamic law. (Of course, “that depends
on what your definition of ‘Islamic law,’ is.” Wahhabi? Turkish?
Nigerian? Iranian?) And of course the preferred way to get such
leadership in place is through regime change, whether violent (the
former Taliban in Afghanistan) or more populist (the Islamic Revolution
in Iran). Jihadi ideology also calls for an end to outside
“imperialism”—i.e., American influence and intervention—in the Muslim
world in general and the Middle East in particular (especially Arabia,
the site of the two holy cities of Mecca and Medina).
There is another strain of fundamentalist ideology, however, that may not be willing to wait for jihadi governments to come to power: Mahdism. Al-Mahdi
is “the rightly-guided one” who, in Islamic traditions allegedly going
back to Muhammad (and nowhere to be found in the Qur’an), will come
before The End of time to usher in a worldwide Islamic state with a
little help from his returned prophet friend Jesus.2
Mahdism is believed by many (including scholars, who should know
better) to be the province only of the Shi`is, but many of the most
successful Mahdist movements in history have been Sunni. Most prominent
here would be Ibn Tumart’s al-Muwahhids (Almohads) who ruled from Portugal to Tunisia, 1130-1269 CE, and Muhammad Ahmad’s Sudanese Mahdists—about whom the movie Khartoum,
starring Charlton Heston and Sir Laurence Olivier was made—who ruled
Sudan from 1885-1898. Another famous Mahdist movement, albeit ultimately
unsuccessful, was the attempt to overthrow the Saudi regime in 1979:
one Juhayman al-Utaybi declared his brother-in-law Muhammad al-Qahtani
to be the Mahdi and led several hundred armed followers to occupy the
main mosque in Mecca (eventually all were either killed or captured and
then executed). Scores of other self-styled mahdis have arisen over the
last millennium of Islamic history. If nothing else, Mahdism is
certainly a powerful means of expressing dissatisfaction with extant
Islamic government.
And Mahdism shares many characteristics with mere jihadism,
the most important of which are: a yearning (indeed demand) for Islamic
law and a burning desire to restore Islamic rule to its former environs
and, in fact, to engineer the creation of a global caliphate. But
Mahdist movements “are to fundamentalist uprisings what nuclear weapons
are to conventional ones: triggered by the same detonating agents3 but far more powerful in scope and effect.”4
Once a charismatic Muslim leader becomes convinced he is the Mahdi, all
bets are off. The Mahdi (and each one is of course convinced he is THE,
not simply a, Mahdi) will, according to the Islamic traditions, be
directed by Allah to restore the Prophetic caliphate and, as such, is
not bound by the letter of the Islamic law. For example, both Ibn Tumart
and Muhammad Ahmad declared that they alone were capable of
interpreting the Qur’an, so any previous opinions and commentaries were
relegated to irrelevance. And of course the opposition to them by
establishment religious figures—for both of these men, as do most
Mahdist, led revolutions against existing Islamic governments5—only
served to reinforce their Mahdist claims, since true Muslims could
recognize the Mahdi. Anyone claiming to be the Mahdi, then, is largely
unfettered by any norms, Islamic or otherwise. Ibn Tumart and his
leadership, for example, killed tens of thousands OF THEIR OWN FOLLOWERS
deemed lukewarm in their support. And Muhammad Ahmad, who had Charles
Gordon decapitated and his head displayed, may have proved just as
bloodthirsty had he not died of malaria some six months after taking
Khartoum.
There is, today, no one claiming to be the Mahdi—at
least not yet. A number of Arabic books and websites have begun
speculating whether Usamah bin Ladin might be him.6
Certainly no one else in the Islamic world has the stature to even
attempt such a claim. Bin Ladin’s charisma, mysterious whereabouts,
ability to strike and hurt even the American imperium and ongoing
criticism of existing (illegitimate) Islamic rulers may not quite
qualify him for the Mahdi’s ring of power—but they get him closer,
certainly, than anyone else. What if he were to seize it? No doubt the
vast majority of the world’s Muslims would reject such a claim out of
hand. Many who see Bin Ladin now as something of a Muslim Che Guevara
would certainly renounce him as Mahdi, but the small percentage that
would accept such a claim would be intensely devoted and fanatical. If
that amounts to only 1 percent of the world’s Muslims, the Mahdi would
have 13 million potential suicide bombers.
And make no mistake: Mahdists would have even fewer constraints on their behaviour than do jihadis.
Since the end result of the Mahdi’s plans would be, they believe, a
global caliphate nothing would he asked would be beyond his followers:
detonating a nuke in Vegas or Manhattan, intentionally infecting oneself
with plague or smallpox and then criss-crossing American aiports,
suicide-bombing Christian day care centers in the Midwest. Helping the
Mahdi restore Islam to planetary predominance would obtain one even more
glory than the promised 72 huris in Paradise. And were Bin
Ladin (or anyone else) to take power in, say, Arabia as the Mahdi, the
entire world (even the French) would soon be waxing nostalgic about the
Saudis.
Even if Bin Ladin eschews a Mahdi claim, someone eventually will make it. The Mahdi is often associated with a mujaddid, a “renewer” that according to other Islamic traditions will come every 100 years to reinvigorate Islam. And considering that the 16th Muslim century begins in 2076, the American tercentenary may be met with more than normal fireworks.
1 See my article “Islamic Fundamentalism,” Encyclopedia of Fundamentalism ( New York and London: Routledge, 2001), pp. 235-240.
2 Mahdism and Madhist movements are the focus of my new book Holiest Wars: Islamic Mahdis, their Jihads and Osama bin Laden ( Westport, CT: Praeger, 2005).
3 Such as perceived illegitimate “Islamic” governments; a perceived diminution of Islamic norms; moral laxity of rulers and/or society; interference by foreign powers (usually, but not always, non-Islamic ones; the Sudanese Mahdi, for instance, despised the Ottoman Turks although they were Muslims).
4Ibid., p. 1.
5 Ibn Tumart led the overthrow of the previous al-Murabit (Almoravid) sultanate, while Muhammad Ahmad and his followers ejected the Ottoman Turks, Egyptians and British from Sudan.
6Holiest Wars, especially chapter 6: “Who will be the next Mahdi?”, pp. 150ff.
Showing 2 comments
-
- C.L Edwards
-
- beast3
관련 사이트: 마흐디워치 닷 컴
-
notice
세월호를 침몰시킨 자들이 우한폐렴바이러스를 퍼트렸고, 그리고 4.15 총선을 부정선거로 완결시킬 것이다.
우한폐렴 사태에 즈음하여 문재인이 비선실세들에 휘둘려서 정세판단을 못해서, 마스크 어쩌고 저쩌고 라고 안철수가 말 했다고 한다. 웃기는 얘기다. 안철수나 박지원이나 김진태나 조원진이나 유승민이나 그 누구든 다 이 '비선'실세의 조정을 받는 꼭...Date2020.02.26 Category프리메이슨(일루미나티) Views341658 -
notice
문재인 괴뢰정권의 우한폐렴 음모: 대구를 우한처럼-우한폐렴바이러스는 딥스테이트(프리메이슨)가 만들어 퍼트린것!
2019-nCoV Wuhan Pneumonia infecção e proteção consciência (Portugues) from Jon Chui on Vimeo. -----> 목 차 01)유전물질의 인위적인 조작으로 인해 생겨나는 바이러스 변종들 02)중공, 2004년 이전, 북경 실험실에서 싸스-코로나바...Date2020.01.31 Category인종학살: 우한폐렴(코로나19)과 백신 Views345161 -
No Image
기독교 시설에만 세금 부과 의도는?
제 목 : 기독교 시설에만 세금 부과 의도는?글쓴이 : 관리자 조회수 : 45 등록일 : 2012/07/09 기독교 시설에만 세금 부과 의도는? 지난 달 20일 서울 강남구청에서는 ‘감면 재산세 등 5억 745만원 추징’이라는 제목의 보도자료를 냈다. 내용인즉, 사회복...Date2012.07.25 Category모슬렘 Views27192 -
민통당 최재천 의원의 좌파ㆍ불교적 편향성-특위 위원에서 제외시켜야.
민주통합당 최재천 대법관인사청문회위원의 좌파ㆍ불교적 편향성-특위 위원에서 제외시켜야. 7월10일부터 진행되고 있는 대법관 인사청문회의 민주통합당(이하, 민통당) 측 최재천 위원(불교, 경기 남양주시 갑)는 8일 기자간담회(국회)에서 김...Date2012.07.12 Category모슬렘 Views25626 -
No Image
사찰은 가만두던데… 지자체, 교회에 ‘세금폭탄’ 왜?
사찰은 가만두던데… 지자체, 교회에 ‘세금폭탄’ 왜? [2012.07.06 16:34] ...Date2012.07.09 Category모슬렘 Views32719 -
No Image
강북제일교회, 종교의 자유를 사수하라
강북제일교회, 종교의 자유를 사수하라 교단은 종교의 자유 스스로 포기 황규학 (500) 강북제일교회 게시판에 들어가면 "총회의 장로임직 무효결정이 대법...Date2012.07.05 Category모슬렘 Views27930 -
No Image
강남구청의 추징, ‘교회의 탈세’로 보는 시선 적절한가
강남구청의 추징, ‘교회의 탈세’로 보는 시선 적절한가 크리스천투데이 김진영 기자 jykim@chtoday.co.kr 김진영 기자의 다른 기사 보기 기사 ...Date2012.06.29 Category모슬렘 Views27856 -
No Image
SBS, YTN의 의도적 교회 관련왜곡보도와 네이버 뉴스캐스트의 문제점
SBS, YTN의 의도적 교회 관련왜곡보도와 네이버 뉴스캐스트의 문제점 글쓴이 : 관리자 조회수 : 25 등록일 : 2012/06/28 지 난 6월 25일 SBS방송에서는 3개의 교회에 대해 문제시하는 방송을...Date2012.06.29 Category모슬렘 Views30035 -
No Image
“인권 미명하에 자행하는 기독교 공격 중단하라”
“인권 미명하에 자행하는 기독교 공격 중단하라” 크리스천투데이 이대웅 기자 dwlee@chtoday.co.kr 이대웅 기자의 다른 기사 보기 기사 ...Date2012.06.16 Category모슬렘 Views28162 -
No Image
종교자유정책연구원의 정체성은 기독교 공격의 선봉
제 목 : 종교자유정책연구원의 정체성은 기독교 공격의 선봉 글쓴이 : 관리자 조회수 : 11 등록일 : 2012/06/15 종교자유정책연구원의 정체성은 기독교 공격의 선봉 국가인권위원회가 기독교 ...Date2012.06.16 Category모슬렘 Views27458 -
No Image
사랑의교회 건축은 계속되어야 한다
사랑의교회 건축은 계속되어야 한다 글쓴이 : 관리자 조회수 : 42 등록일 : 2012/06/05 사 랑의교회 건축에 대하여 시민 옴부즈맨들이 지난 1일 제동을 걸고 나왔다. 이는 ‘도로 점용 허가(...Date2012.06.07 Category모슬렘 Views26604 -
No Image
‘이슬람포비아’의 정체
[이만석 칼럼] ‘이슬람포비아’의 정체 크리스천투데이 기사 입력 : 2012.06.07 06:57 실제적이고 얼마든지 실현 가능한 것 ...Date2012.06.07 Category모슬렘 Views50364 -
No Image
2012년 5월에 세계도처에서 자행되고 있는, 무슬림들에 의한 기독교 핍박들
May 18, 2012 Muslim Persecution of Christians: April, 2012 Over at Gatestone Institute (via RaymondIbrahim.com), I chronicle the many abuses Christians suffered under Islam in the month of April -- several...Date2012.05.19 Category모슬렘 Views166082 -
No Image
종교인 과세문제, 합리적으로 논의할 때가 되었다
종교인 과세문제, 합리적으로 논의할 때가 되었다 글쓴이 : 관리자 조회수 : 60 등록일 : 2012/03/20 최 근 기독교계에서 ‘목회자들의 소득세 납부’에 대한 논의가 재개되었고, 이것의 영향...Date2012.03.24 Category모슬렘 Views28777 -
No Image
폭력적인 지하디스트들보다 더 나쁜 자들은 누구인가?
What's Worse than Violent Jihadists? By Timothy R. Furnish Mr. Furnish, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor, History, Georgia Perimeter College; Ph.D., Islamic History; M.A., Church History. ...Date2012.02.26 Category모슬렘 Views128526 -
No Image
이데올로기로서의 이슬람과 공산주의
아래 필자가 자신이 말하고 있는 이슬람은 근본주의적 이슬람(Fundamentalist Islam)이라고 한정하고 있기는 해도, 그 이슬람은 공산주의 이데올로기의 국가사회적 기능을 행하고 있다고 그는 주장한다. 즉 공산국가가 보여주었던 그대로의 행적을 이슬람...Date2012.02.12 Category모슬렘 Views40304 -
No Image
기독교계, MB정부의 반인권적 ‘여권법 개정안’의 위헌성 검토
기독교계, MB정부의 반인권적 ‘여권법 개정안’의 위헌성 검토 2011-07-11 12:44:58 조회: 16회 댓글: 0개 기독교계, MB정부의 반인권적 ‘여권법 개정안’의 위헌성 검토 외교통상부가 올해 초부터 추진해 온 여권법 시행령 개정안을 지난 4일 입법예고한...Date2011.07.20 Category모슬렘 Views32675 -
No Image
외교통상부 백주현 재외동포영사국장을 즉각 경질하라
제목 : 외교통상부 백주현 재외동포영사국장을 즉각 경질하라 작성자 김용국 작성일 2011.07.13 대통령을 위한 기도 시민연대(PUP) 성명서 기독교계의 의견을 "과잉반응"으로 일축한 외교통상부 백주현 재외동포영사국장을 즉각 경질하라 [성명서] 이대통령은 ...Date2011.07.13 Category모슬렘 Views32915 -
누구를 위한 여권법 개정인가?
제 목 : 누구를 위한 여권법 개정인가? 글쓴이 : 관리자 조회수 : 48 등록일 : 2011/07/04 정부(외교통상부)가 그동안 문제점이 많은 것으로 알려진 “여권법”을 기어이 국무회의에서 곧 통과시키려 하여, 반발을 사고 있다. 정부가 이 법을 개정하려는 목적은...Date2011.07.08 Category모슬렘 Views37682 -
No Image
자국선 정치단체, 서방엔 눈엣가시
http://osen.mt.co.kr/news/view.html?mCode=&gid=G1105170351자국선 정치단체, 서방엔 눈엣가시 스크랩 : 트위터페이스북미투데이네이트로 스크랩하기요즘공감|입력 : 2011.05.17 17:19|조회 : 314 - 빈 라덴 사후 주목받는 테러단체 [이브닝신문/OSEN=오현주...Date2011.06.14 Category모슬렘 Views30221 -
No Image
한겨레신문의 종교편향과, 이슬람 밀어주기
제 목 : 한겨레신문의 종교편향과, 이슬람 밀어주기 글쓴이 : 관리자 조회수 : 75 등록일 : 2011/05/19 한겨레신문은 올 해로 창간 23주년을 맞는 언론이다. 당시 언론 통·폐합 과정에서 언론사에서 해직된 기자들이 중심이 되어 창간된 언론이며, 진보적 색채...Date2011.05.21 Category모슬렘 Views29808 -
No Image
증권사, 대통령 인니.말레이순방에 동참 사연은
http://app.yonhapnews.co.kr/YNA/Basic/article/new_search/YIBW_showSearchArticle.aspx?searchpart=article&searchtext=%ec%88%98%ec%bf%a0%ed%81%ac&contents_id=AKR20101207045300008 (서울=연합뉴스) 김세진 기자 = 오는 9일부터 이틀동안 진행되는 이명...Date2010.12.09 Category모슬렘 Views31146
Designed by sketchbooks.co.kr / sketchbook5 board skin
Sketchbook5, 스케치북5
Sketchbook5, 스케치북5
Sketchbook5, 스케치북5
Sketchbook5, 스케치북5